There are many false names Abortion goes by hide its true character. Woman's right to choose, Reproductive rights (which is neither reproductive nor a right), Woman's right over her body, etc, but no matter which name you choose, it is in reality the TERMINATION of a human life by unnatural means. Science agree its not a clump of cells but has LIFE.
"We do not want word to get out, that we want to exterminate the negro race." --Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood)
|
Argument #1: Woman's body, woman's choice
The infant scientifically is NEVER THE WOMAN'S BODY, even within the womb. This is because the infant is completely separated from the mother by the placenta. At the placenta the infant's blood and body stops and the woman's blood and body stops. The infant is a completely separate human being even within the womb.
Argument #2: Access to Abortion is access to woman's healthcare.
This is the wording that Roe v Wade has indicating abortion is necessary for woman's (MENTAL) health. This is 100% scientifically and medically wrong. Even when the fetus is putting the mother's life in danger, killing the fetus by tearing it limb from limb does not save the mother's life. What could be better for a pregnant woman's MENTAL health than successfully getting the baby out of her body safely? All doctors agree that the woman's life is saved by DELIVERY of the child, even if it requires a cesarean section to remove the child. Even the most hasty done cesarean section is far safer and less risky than that of the most well performed abortion.
Argument #3 Abortion is completely SAFE
Its so safe that women have a very high chance of DYING from infection if the all pieces of the DISMEMBERED baby/fetus is not completely removed. And even if everything is purged from the womb, there is still a great chance of infection that can kill the aborting woman within days of the abortion. (7/21/23)
Argument #4: Its just a clump of cells and its up to the woman whether it should be removed from her body.
This is a very common argument among college grads who think they know science well enough. They view the fetus as one would a cancerous tumor. They do not see the fetus as alive. This however goes contrary to all known science and especially biological science. A 2019 study found that out of 5,577 biologists, from over a thousand academic institutions in 86 countries, 96% affirmed life begins at fertilization. As far back as 1999 they already had 95% of 5,500 biologist confirm life began at conception.
Argument #5: Its better to abort an unwanted child that can't be cared for.
This is the worse argument that can be given for abortion, as its cold and unfeeling. There are full grown adults that are unwanted. Does that justify their murder? This is the type of immorality Hitler practiced at his numerous death camps murdering 15-20 million people. Mao, Lenin, Stalin, and many others despots murdered 75 million UNWANTED people, including children. Is this the evil abortion advocates are seeking to continue?
Argument #6: Abortion should be kept legal for the cases of rape and incest.
Abortion for the reason of rape and incest only make up only 1% of all abortions in the US according to the NY Times. How does killing the child for the crimes of his father help? 2 wrongs don't make a right. And aborting the child is actually violating the woman a 2nd time. Also a study of rape victims found that 75-85% chose AGAINST abortion.
Argument #7: The fetus can't feel anything in the womb.
Abortion, the painful tearing apart of a fetus, is observed pain can be felt at 8 weeks and even anticipated by the fetus in some cases. You can watch an abortion on ultrasound and see the baby move away from the abortionist’s tools.
Argument #8: Abortions are only done to save the life of the mother and the fetus has something wrong with it.
All doctors agree that the woman's life is saved by DELIVERY of the child, even if it requires a cesarean section to remove the child. Even a cesarean section is far safer, can be done quickly as an emergency surgery, and less risky that even the most well performed abortion. If something is wrong with the fetus, a miscarriage usually occurs long before an abortion can be used.
Argument #9: Abortion should be allowed and available until the fetus is alive (viable outside the womb)
When is the baby ever viable (able to survive on their own)? Even the most healthy, full term baby is not able to survive on their own, ever. They still need the mother's milk, warmth, clothing, shelter, and food, otherwise they'd die. Even as children in college they are still DEPENDENT on their parents for food, clothing, housing, etc. Yet no one is allowed to walk up to a toddler, junior higher, high schooler, or even college student and tear them limb from limb until they are dead. That would be called MURDER. So why isn't the same thing to an equally non-viable human in the womb that is dependent on his/her parent not called murder as well??
Argument #10: There is should be no laws limiting the woman's body when there are no laws limiting a man's body.
This a complete fallacy as there are plenty of laws limiting a man's body. Assault laws does not a man to hit anyone else. Even draft laws in the time of war take away a man's right to his body and even his life.
Argument #11: Abortion should be allowed because Earth is OVERPOPULATED.
This is the one of the biggest LIES in the world, used by Socialist and tyrants to justify wholesale ethnic cleansing. World numbers are projected to reach 8 billion around 2023, a doubling time of 49 years, and barring the unforeseen, expected to level off around 10 to 12 billion by 2100. Earth currently shows that it can easily support 5 times our population as of 2018.* It is only the mismanagement of resources in China, India, and Africa that makes it look like Earth's capacity is a lot less than what it is in reality. But according to the UN we will never get to the point where earth is overpopulated, as our WORLD FERTILITY RATE IS TANKING. UN Population Division's world fertility patterns show that, worldwide, fertility per woman has fallen from 4.44 babies in 1970-75 to 2.53 in 2005-10.
* If 7.5 billion people consumed water at American levels, world usage would top 10,000 cubic kilometers per year. Total world supply – freshwater lakes and rivers – is about 93,000 cubic kilometers.
The infant scientifically is NEVER THE WOMAN'S BODY, even within the womb. This is because the infant is completely separated from the mother by the placenta. At the placenta the infant's blood and body stops and the woman's blood and body stops. The infant is a completely separate human being even within the womb.
Argument #2: Access to Abortion is access to woman's healthcare.
This is the wording that Roe v Wade has indicating abortion is necessary for woman's (MENTAL) health. This is 100% scientifically and medically wrong. Even when the fetus is putting the mother's life in danger, killing the fetus by tearing it limb from limb does not save the mother's life. What could be better for a pregnant woman's MENTAL health than successfully getting the baby out of her body safely? All doctors agree that the woman's life is saved by DELIVERY of the child, even if it requires a cesarean section to remove the child. Even the most hasty done cesarean section is far safer and less risky than that of the most well performed abortion.
Argument #3 Abortion is completely SAFE
Its so safe that women have a very high chance of DYING from infection if the all pieces of the DISMEMBERED baby/fetus is not completely removed. And even if everything is purged from the womb, there is still a great chance of infection that can kill the aborting woman within days of the abortion. (7/21/23)
Argument #4: Its just a clump of cells and its up to the woman whether it should be removed from her body.
This is a very common argument among college grads who think they know science well enough. They view the fetus as one would a cancerous tumor. They do not see the fetus as alive. This however goes contrary to all known science and especially biological science. A 2019 study found that out of 5,577 biologists, from over a thousand academic institutions in 86 countries, 96% affirmed life begins at fertilization. As far back as 1999 they already had 95% of 5,500 biologist confirm life began at conception.
Argument #5: Its better to abort an unwanted child that can't be cared for.
This is the worse argument that can be given for abortion, as its cold and unfeeling. There are full grown adults that are unwanted. Does that justify their murder? This is the type of immorality Hitler practiced at his numerous death camps murdering 15-20 million people. Mao, Lenin, Stalin, and many others despots murdered 75 million UNWANTED people, including children. Is this the evil abortion advocates are seeking to continue?
Argument #6: Abortion should be kept legal for the cases of rape and incest.
Abortion for the reason of rape and incest only make up only 1% of all abortions in the US according to the NY Times. How does killing the child for the crimes of his father help? 2 wrongs don't make a right. And aborting the child is actually violating the woman a 2nd time. Also a study of rape victims found that 75-85% chose AGAINST abortion.
Argument #7: The fetus can't feel anything in the womb.
Abortion, the painful tearing apart of a fetus, is observed pain can be felt at 8 weeks and even anticipated by the fetus in some cases. You can watch an abortion on ultrasound and see the baby move away from the abortionist’s tools.
Argument #8: Abortions are only done to save the life of the mother and the fetus has something wrong with it.
All doctors agree that the woman's life is saved by DELIVERY of the child, even if it requires a cesarean section to remove the child. Even a cesarean section is far safer, can be done quickly as an emergency surgery, and less risky that even the most well performed abortion. If something is wrong with the fetus, a miscarriage usually occurs long before an abortion can be used.
Argument #9: Abortion should be allowed and available until the fetus is alive (viable outside the womb)
When is the baby ever viable (able to survive on their own)? Even the most healthy, full term baby is not able to survive on their own, ever. They still need the mother's milk, warmth, clothing, shelter, and food, otherwise they'd die. Even as children in college they are still DEPENDENT on their parents for food, clothing, housing, etc. Yet no one is allowed to walk up to a toddler, junior higher, high schooler, or even college student and tear them limb from limb until they are dead. That would be called MURDER. So why isn't the same thing to an equally non-viable human in the womb that is dependent on his/her parent not called murder as well??
Argument #10: There is should be no laws limiting the woman's body when there are no laws limiting a man's body.
This a complete fallacy as there are plenty of laws limiting a man's body. Assault laws does not a man to hit anyone else. Even draft laws in the time of war take away a man's right to his body and even his life.
Argument #11: Abortion should be allowed because Earth is OVERPOPULATED.
This is the one of the biggest LIES in the world, used by Socialist and tyrants to justify wholesale ethnic cleansing. World numbers are projected to reach 8 billion around 2023, a doubling time of 49 years, and barring the unforeseen, expected to level off around 10 to 12 billion by 2100. Earth currently shows that it can easily support 5 times our population as of 2018.* It is only the mismanagement of resources in China, India, and Africa that makes it look like Earth's capacity is a lot less than what it is in reality. But according to the UN we will never get to the point where earth is overpopulated, as our WORLD FERTILITY RATE IS TANKING. UN Population Division's world fertility patterns show that, worldwide, fertility per woman has fallen from 4.44 babies in 1970-75 to 2.53 in 2005-10.
* If 7.5 billion people consumed water at American levels, world usage would top 10,000 cubic kilometers per year. Total world supply – freshwater lakes and rivers – is about 93,000 cubic kilometers.
|
|
|
|
|
Relatable Example:
Imagine if you would that you are in a long line for the next generation Iphone. You have been patiently enduring days of being in this long line, enduring countless hours of boredom and exhaustion. You have most of your existence and life tied up in your current Iphone. So you endure it all the rain, sleet, snow (uphill in both directions of course). Finally the store opens it doors and begin letting people thru one at a time as a sales rep meets at them individually with a box in hand. As the moments go by you can hardly contain your emotions and excitement. They are ushering people in to begin their new life!!
Finally you are at the front of the line. Your long hours of waiting and enduring are about to pay off. Your eyes strain to see thru the tinted glass of the store, struggling to glimpse the silhouette of a sales rep moving toward the doors you now stand before. You silently wish they would hurry and not trip of something on the way. Suddenly the doors open and sales rep shows up in front of you. Your eyes do a quick scan and realize that this one carries no box in his hand like the ones before had. Your euphoria gives way to sudden apprehension.
The sales rep speaks and gives you terrible news. They are all sold out. Your mind reels from the impact of what the sales rep is saying. Your dreams are crushed as is your hope for a new life with the next generation Iphone. As reality sets in that you are no entering the store you are jolted back into reality. You are now being told that it has been the decision of all those countless people BEFORE you, that you and everyone still in line are to leave behind your current Iphone. Apparently you have absolutely no say in the matter, as the decision was made by those already within the store. The decision is final. As you look down the long beleaguered line, you notice they are forcibly extricating phones from people's hands, and sending them home shattered, their lives forever ruined.
What would you be thinking at this point?? How could they do this to people, taking their very means of life from them all because they weren't further up in the line?? How bitterly unfair, cold, and unjust the system and the people inside could be?? Where is their humanity and compassion?? All very valid questions. So what does give those of us, who came BEFORE others still in the womb, the right to take away their very LIVES??
Imagine if you would that you are in a long line for the next generation Iphone. You have been patiently enduring days of being in this long line, enduring countless hours of boredom and exhaustion. You have most of your existence and life tied up in your current Iphone. So you endure it all the rain, sleet, snow (uphill in both directions of course). Finally the store opens it doors and begin letting people thru one at a time as a sales rep meets at them individually with a box in hand. As the moments go by you can hardly contain your emotions and excitement. They are ushering people in to begin their new life!!
Finally you are at the front of the line. Your long hours of waiting and enduring are about to pay off. Your eyes strain to see thru the tinted glass of the store, struggling to glimpse the silhouette of a sales rep moving toward the doors you now stand before. You silently wish they would hurry and not trip of something on the way. Suddenly the doors open and sales rep shows up in front of you. Your eyes do a quick scan and realize that this one carries no box in his hand like the ones before had. Your euphoria gives way to sudden apprehension.
The sales rep speaks and gives you terrible news. They are all sold out. Your mind reels from the impact of what the sales rep is saying. Your dreams are crushed as is your hope for a new life with the next generation Iphone. As reality sets in that you are no entering the store you are jolted back into reality. You are now being told that it has been the decision of all those countless people BEFORE you, that you and everyone still in line are to leave behind your current Iphone. Apparently you have absolutely no say in the matter, as the decision was made by those already within the store. The decision is final. As you look down the long beleaguered line, you notice they are forcibly extricating phones from people's hands, and sending them home shattered, their lives forever ruined.
What would you be thinking at this point?? How could they do this to people, taking their very means of life from them all because they weren't further up in the line?? How bitterly unfair, cold, and unjust the system and the people inside could be?? Where is their humanity and compassion?? All very valid questions. So what does give those of us, who came BEFORE others still in the womb, the right to take away their very LIVES??
Conclusion
As can be seen with facts of each argument for abortion, it becomes very clear that the issue of abortion is for the convience. It allows avoiding the consequence unbridled sex by women, which is a hallmark of the 3rd wave feminist. Feminist don't want women to be burdened down with taking time off from work to bear and raise a child. Yet at the same time they demand women to do what makes them most happy which includes having sex as much as they want during all dates and insist they aren't sluts doing so. Abortion is their way out.
However abortion is clearly murder of a human and the morally should not ever be ignored. If murder of babies and toddlers is morally and legally wrong, murder of still growing babies in their mothers stomachs are equally wrong. To give any excuses for this murder is to be morally reprehensible and unacceptable, especially when every one of their arguments fail against the truth of facts. As for any Christian, it should also be equally unacceptable. After all our Lord and Savior said, "Thou SHALT NOT MURDER without any condition on age or whether or not the human was still in the womb or not.
As can be seen with facts of each argument for abortion, it becomes very clear that the issue of abortion is for the convience. It allows avoiding the consequence unbridled sex by women, which is a hallmark of the 3rd wave feminist. Feminist don't want women to be burdened down with taking time off from work to bear and raise a child. Yet at the same time they demand women to do what makes them most happy which includes having sex as much as they want during all dates and insist they aren't sluts doing so. Abortion is their way out.
However abortion is clearly murder of a human and the morally should not ever be ignored. If murder of babies and toddlers is morally and legally wrong, murder of still growing babies in their mothers stomachs are equally wrong. To give any excuses for this murder is to be morally reprehensible and unacceptable, especially when every one of their arguments fail against the truth of facts. As for any Christian, it should also be equally unacceptable. After all our Lord and Savior said, "Thou SHALT NOT MURDER without any condition on age or whether or not the human was still in the womb or not.